What is the controversy surrounding Hela cells?

cells are an example of immortal cell lines that will maintain reproduction under normal checks that stop cellular growth. They are the topic of controversy and discussion, because the original sample of cells cultivated for their growth has been accepted without the patient's consent, Henrietta is missing. The story of these cells illustrates some of the ethical concerns involved in tissue and cellular cultures, as well as some incorrect steps in the history of science. Huge breakthroughs in the sciences continue to be carried out with the kind permission of Hela cells, which emphasizes their contribution to science despite their origin. Some cells were taken by a researcher who tried to cultivate immortal cell lines for scientific purposes. In the 1950s of the 20th century of routine tissue practice without the consent of Patients was not unusual and the anonymization of the source was not a primary problem. The cells were named "Hela" code for "Henrietta Lacks".

Family LaterShe learned about the use of cells in scientific research and feared that they were used without consent. Hela cells and concerns that surrounded them touched several questions in medicine. One of them was the question of using tissue samples without consulting patients, many of whom would be freely donated if they were asked. Changes in how these samples are accepted and processed, and in the processes used to collect consent, increased the use of informed consent in the research. For example, patients presenting biopsy for diagnostic purposes

In some communities, especially racial minorities, there was also a historical distrust. Henrietta Lacks was a black and some people felt that her story was part of a larger heritage of cases where people were used for medical research. Its family members were later asked to contribute to research purposes under circumstances that were somewhat unclear; Some family members claim that informed consent has not been obtained and thought they were receivingCancer tests while doctors claim to have been informed of the nature of testing.

non -consumption testing on minority populations included activities, such as the infamous experiment of syphilis tuskegee and research of early doses of contraception to Puerto Rico who had devastating consequences for their objects. These studies were carried out without the benefits of modern ethical audit advice and protocols to protect the interest of patients. The history of such experimentation has caused some of the populations to be reluctant to trust scientists and research, which also contributed to public health problems such as the rejection of the treatment of Venstrach. The reach by the medical community for the purpose of solving the origin of these concerns and providing information on measures by adopting to prevent similar incidents was partially evoked by discussions about Hela cells.

Hela cell research emphasized some historical tension in science between the need for research and the desire to protect the health and safety of patients and research entities. Many scientists agree to beIf invaluable for scientific research. Discussions of their turbid origin can acknowledge their importance in science and at the same time help scientists develop better methods to obtain the consent and documenting their procedures.