What is the work?

6 This is closely linked to the clothing and textile industry and is also used to build some electronics. It was also the subject of a historical debate, because some opponents believe that the work is harmful to workers, while supporting that it supports the economy of the free market. Both parties have valid points and some governments tried to solve this problem.

The concept of piece work is quite old. In the English language, the idea of ​​working home apprentices dates back to 1500 years. The development of the assembly line systems further supported this concept because it is well suitable for creating a small part of an individual. As a result, piece work is often associated with working on a sweatshirt in many people, because it was often performed in exhausting conditions and accompanied by long hours. In some case, this can also be achieved at home, which raised questions about work regulation, as the home is not easily regulated or checked by the environment.

With the development of factories, many companies have accepted the traditional work system. The factory workers have noticed the amount of work they have completed, and usually submitted the tracking stumps to the leader who checked the work twice before they checked in so that the employees could be paid. Some modern factories continue to use this system, especially in developing countries.

The

piece of work is considered an excellent example of performance -related performance, as the amount of house remuneration is directly associated with the performance of the worker. Fans of these systems claim that workers are rewarded for distinguishing themselves, while slower workers are quite compensated for their work. By direct binding of the reward to the amount of items, this encourages workers to complete the tasks at high speed and is translated into a higher efficiency for hiring workers.

opponents of the work point out that the high rate of speed can be dangerous for workers and that it canto promote injury, not efficacy. There were also concerns about the amount of remuneration received, while some advocates claimed that slower workers were not in fact fairly compensated. This method of compensation also places value on the amount above the quality that may not be required.