What is the principle of Dilbert?

Scott Adams' Syndicated comics "Dilbert" routinely satirizes the corporate world and strange characters that inhabit it. In the age of 90, Adams developed his own satirical "dilbert principle" in response to the popularity of axioma in human resources such as "Peter principle". While the principle of Peter claims that competent employees are commonly promoted until they reach the level of incompetence, the Dilbert principle suggests that incompetent employees are often promoted to managerial positions to prevent further damage in the working series. The newly promoted manager would be able to fulfill his day by participating in ineffective meetings and composing a mission statement, while workers with a series and the ensemble could continue with real business business.

<

<

When the first language principle appeared in the press, most of the human resources and business organizations considered it anything but satirical acquisition of established theories of the management hierarchy. For inThere would be no point in deliberately promoting their least competent employees to managerial positions with the main duties. The purpose of promotional actions was to reward competent employees for their skills, not to remove incompetent employees from the fire line.

Over time, however, many of these same experts would see the hidden wisdom behind the dilbert principle. In many large corporations, some positions of higher management have shown far from the company's daily operations far from the company. Indeed, it was possible to promote incompetent employees from the regular department and into the foggy middle management of the positions for the purpose of placing angry customers, dissatisfied collaborators or frustrated supervisors.

While the principle of Dilbert could be as a satirical strike in human resources practices, since then reading in many classesChodní organization. The actual number of incompetent employees who benefited from these promotional actions may always be a question of dispute, but at least the corporate world admits that the Dilbert principle is more closely than suspicious.