What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative research?
Qualitative and quantitative research is two main research schools, and although they are often used in tandem, the advantages and disadvantages of each of them are warmly discussed. Especially in social sciences, the merit of qualitative and quantitative research with intensive views on both sides of the argument fought. In general, however, it agrees that there are some research phases where one or the other is obviously more useful than the other, and so few people will completely reject. Quantitative research involves collecting data that is absolute, such as numerical data, so it can be examined in the most pleasant way. There are many principles that go along with quantitative research that help support its expected neutrality. Quantitative research generally comments more in the research project as soon as the scope of the project is well understood.
The main idea of quantitative research is to be able to easilySeparate things to calculate and model statistically to remove factors that may turn away from the research intention. The researcher generally has a very clear idea of what is measured before they start to measure, and their study is set up with controls and a very clear plan. The tools used are designed to minimize any distortion, so ideally there are machines that collect information, and are ideally ideally randomized surveys. The result of quantitative research is a collection of numbers that can be subjected to statistical analysis to achieve the results.
The remaining separated from research emotionally is a key aspect of quantitative research, as well as removal of distortion of the researcher. For things such as astronomy or other -hard science, this means that quantitative research has a very minimum amount of distortion at all. For things like sociological data, that is, most distortion is perhaps limited to the one presented by the studiesPeople, which can be somewhat taken into account in models. Quantitative is ideal for testing hypotheses and for hard sciences trying to answer specific questions.
Qualitative research, on the other hand, is a much more subjective form of research in which research allows you to introduce your own bias to help create a more complete image. Qualitative research may be essential in situations where it is not clear exactly what the study is looking for, so the scientist must be able to determine what data are important and what is not. Although quantitative research generally knows exactly what he is looking for before the start of research, in qualitative research, the study can manifest itself over time.often data presented from qualitative research will be much less specific than net numbers such as data. Instead, quality research can bring stories or pictures or descriptions of feelings and emotions. The interpretation of research entities has a weight in qualitative research, so there is no effort to reduce their bias. At the same time scientists tend to be moreE emotionally attached to qualitative research, so their own distortion can also play strongly.
There are two contradictory schools in social sciences. One believes that fields such as sociology and psychology should try to be the most stringent and quantitative to bring results that can be generally generalized and to maintain the respect of the scientific community. Another claims that these fields benefit from qualitative research because it allows a richer study of the subject and allows you to collect information that would otherwise be fully lacking in quantitative approach. Although in recent years attempts have been made to find a stronger synthesis between them, the debate is raging, and many social scientists have sharply falling on one side.